Routing and quality decision in mobile ip networks

ABSTRACT

The invention relates to a method for routing streams of traffic in IP networks, particularly in mobile IP networks. The invention involves a plurality of streams of traffic to be transmitted being routed such that they are transmitted in a carrier/context ( 7 ). The plurality of streams of traffic at different destination networks ( 5; 6 ) and/or demands on transmission quality for the respective stream of traffic are merged and are transmitted from a terminal ( 3 ) via one carrier/context ( 7 ) to a network access node ( 4 ) in the IP network and are routed from there to the respective destination networks and devices.

The invention relates to a method and a computer program for routing streams of traffic in IP networks, in particular in mobile IP networks, taking quality criteria into consideration.

In the state of the art communication networks, in particular mobile phone networks or the Internet, are in principle known for the transmission of information contents to various user instances, likewise the associated terminals.

For closer consideration of the inventive environment we proceed from the following scenario:

-   -   A terminal has a “context”/a “session” at a local network access         point of a packet data network.     -   The terminal would like to establish or maintain a plurality of         streams of traffic to one or more external networks         (simultaneously or in succession) which must be treated         differently (“external” refers to the view of the above named         network access point). The different treatment of the streams of         traffic can be necessary on the basis of the following         circumstances:         -   The streams of traffic have different destination networks,             e.g. a stream of traffic to the public Internet (local             access), another to a corporate network/service             network/Internet Service Provider (external access).         -   The QoS treatment (QoS: Quality of Service) of the streams             of traffic is (must be) different, e.g. for stream of             traffic 1 the QoS class ‘Background class’ is sufficient,             for stream of traffic 2 the QoS class ‘realtime class’ is             required.         -   National and international roaming: e.g. one stream of             traffic is routed via the home network (external access), a             second stream of traffic is routed can be routed to external             networks at the local access point.     -   This differentiation of the streams of traffic can for example         be based on the following criteria:

-   1. Differences in the IP header

-   2. Differences in the application header

-   3. Differences in the QoS handling

-   4. Differing contents (user data)

-   5. Different protocols

-   6. Additional criteria

In FIG. 1 the process sequence of an end-terminal-based routing decision in accordance with the state of the art is illustrated as an example.

In accordance with the state of the art the following procedure is customary:

-   -   The terminal 3 is assigned an IP address and its own         carrier/context 1, 2 for each stream of traffic to be         differentiated. The destination network for the streams of         traffic is in the process a parameter of a context and can be         different for each context.     -   The local access node 4 in the mobile network routs the traffic         corresponding to the used carrier/context to the respective         destination network 5, 6. For example traffic from carrier 1 is         routed via a local access to the public Internet 5, traffic from         carrier 2 is routed to an external access 6 e.g. to a private         input server of a corporate network.

The following are to be named as disadvantages of the state of the art in accordance with today's approach:

-   -   The terminal needs a separate context with specific IP address         for each connection that goes to a separate network.     -   The routing decision must be made already in the terminal.     -   The complexity in the terminal is correspondingly high. If now         the same application is to be executed on both connections,         there can be conflicts.     -   The mobile network has only limited control over the routing         decision of the individual packets. In the best case it can         decide whether a packet on the context used by the terminal is         permissible.

Proceeding from this state of the art the invention is based on the object of specifying a new method with new rules and filter criteria for routing and filtering of streams of traffic in IP networks, in particular in mobile networks and a computer program for the carrying out of the new rules and filter criteria, in order to overcome the disadvantages of the state of the art.

This problem is solved by the method claimed in Claim 1. This method is characterized by the fact that a plurality of streams of traffic to be transmitted is routed in such a way that they are transmitted in one carrier/context.

The transmission of the streams of traffic takes place in the process regardless of whether they must be differentiated with regard to destination network and/or QoS. The transmission in one carrier/context takes place in particular on the air interface from the terminal to a network access node.

In addition in accordance with the invention it is proposed that the local network access nodes of the network routs the streams of traffic with the help of rules and filter criteria to the correct destination. Rules (Policy) and filter criteria can be statically or dynamically configured in the respective network or by another network.

Advantageous embodiments of the invention are specified in the dependent claims.

The above named problem is furthermore solved by a computer program with a program code for the carrying out of the claimed method. The advantages of this solution correspond to the advantages named above with regard to the claimed method.

The advantages of the invention are, enumerated in abbreviated form, the following:

-   -   Full (flexible) network control in the case of routing         decisions, based on configured rules (Policy) & filter criteria     -   The terminal is assigned only one IP address     -   Unnecessary complexity in the terminal is prevented. The         terminal does not have to do any differentiation with regard to         the destination network/routings; as a result the complexity in         the terminal (hardware/software) is considerably lessened.     -   The possibility that the terminal cooperates or expresses its         preferences in the decision about the QoS (quality of service)         and/or destination network and/or routing is still given.     -   The method works uniformly both on networks with the possibility         of several contexts per terminal (e.g. GPRS) as well as also on         networks which do not support multiple contexts per terminal         (e.g. WLAN).

The invention is schematically represented in FIG. 2 and will be described in the following:

Proceeding from the terminal 3 (peer node) in contrast to conventional methods in accordance with FIG. 1 only a single IP address is used in order to be able to transmit different data to the IP network. The data stream consisting of several different streams of traffic is conducted in one single context/carrier 7 to a local access node 4. There, with the help of posted rules and filter criteria, which are for example stored in a memory device, a targeted delivery takes place for specific parts of the data stream to one of if necessary several network nodes of a first network 5. Other parts of the data stream are, on the basis of the posted rules and criteria, also guided to external access nodes 6.

The rules and criteria posted on the network for the routing of the individual streams of traffic can comprise:

-   Information in the IP header -   Information in the application header -   Criteria for QoS handling -   The data contents (user data) -   Protocols used

In principle the number of destination networks in accordance with the invention is not limited.

In closing let it be pointed out that all of the individual aspects of the invention disclosed in the description—to the extent that they are useful—can also be combined with one another, even beyond the examples. 

1. A method for routing streams of traffic in IP networks or in mobile IP networks, characterized in that a plurality of streams of traffic to be transmitted are routed in such a way that they are transmitted in one carrier or context (7), wherein several streams of traffic for different destination networks (5; 6) and/or demands on transmission quality for the respective stream of traffic Quality of Service: QoS are merged and are transmitted from a terminal (3) via one carrier/context (7) to a network access node (4) of the IP network.via a carrier or context (7), wherein the transmission of the streams of traffic takes place regardless of whether they must be distinguished with regard to destination network and/or QoS.
 2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the transmission of the streams of traffic from the terminal (3) to the network access nodes (4) takes place via an air interface.
 3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that rules and filter criteria for statically or dynamically controlling a local network access node (4) of the IP network are configured by its own network or by another network.
 4. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that the rules and filter criteria for controlling a local network access node (4) are stored in the access network node.
 5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that the number of the streams of traffic routed together is not limited.
 6. A computer program for the carrying out of the method according to claim
 1. 7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that rules and filter criteria for statically or dynamically controlling a local network access node (4) of the IP network are configured by its own network or by another network.
 8. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that the rules and filter criteria for controlling a local network access node (4) are stored in the access network node.
 9. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the number of the streams of traffic routed together is not limited.
 10. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that the number of the streams of traffic routed together is not limited.
 11. The method according to claim 3, characterized in that the number of the streams of traffic routed together is not limited.
 12. A computer program for the carrying out of the method according to claim
 2. 13. A computer program for the carrying out of the method according to claim
 3. 14. A computer program for the carrying out of the method according to claim
 4. 15. A computer program for the carrying out of the method according to claim
 5. 